FanPost

Bill Walsh's take on the quarterback position, and why it matters in today's NFL

Bill Walsh is one of the greatest coaches ever in the National Football League, thanks in no small part to his 3 Super Bowl wins in 10 years as the head coach of the San Francisco 49ers, and was inducted to the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1993. When he first took position as the 49ers head coach, he did not waste any time scouting and identifying a player to be his quarterback of the future, drafting Joe Montana of Notre Dame in the third round of the 1979 NFL draft, and later traded a 2nd and 4th pick to get Steve Young from the Buccaneers in 1987 (of course, the Bucs thought at the time that Vinny Testaverde was going to be the franchise quarterback of the future). But perhaps just as significant, Bill Walsh also developed coaches throughout his tenure in the NFL, creating a coaching tree similar to that of Bill Parcells:
791px-bill_walsh_coaching_tree

via upload.wikimedia.org


Looking at this diagram, I'd have to imagine that at least to some extent, Lovie Smith shares some of Bill Walsh's views on what they want from their quarterbacks. So what did Bill Walsh look for in a quarterback? Well, he describes this in detail back in 1997 in his PSX Draft Insider article (Link to Article):

Ideal size: 6-3, 210

To become a great quarterback, there must be instincts and intuition. This is the area that can be the difference between a very solid quarterback and a great quarterback. This isn't an area you can do much with as a coach. You can certainly bring a quarterback up to a competitive standard, but to reach greatness the quarterback must possess that inherently, ala Billy Kilmer, Sonny Jurgensen, Ken Stabler and Warren Moon.

If throwing a ball were the only aspect of playing quarterback, then this would be an easy position to evaluate. However, because of the dynamic role he plays on the team, a quarterback must have physical, mental, emotional and instinctive traits that go well beyond the mere ability to pass a football.

Still, if he can't pass, he obviously won't be a good quarterback either. For now, let's assume our quarterback candidate has shown an ability to throw the ball.

Now, he must be courageous and intensely competitive. He will be the one on the field who is running the team. His teammates must believe in him or it may not matter how much physical ability he has. If he is courageous and intensely competitive, then other players will know and respect that. This will be a foundation for becoming a leader.

Naturally, he will have to perform up to certain physical standards to maintain that respect and become a leader.

Arm strength is somewhat misleading. Some players can throw 80 yards, but they aren't good passers. Good passing has to do with accuracy, timing, and throwing a ball with touch so it is catchable. This all involves understanding a system, the receivers in the system, and having great anticipation. It is a plus to be able to throw a ball on a line for 35 yards, but not if it is off target or arrives in such a way that it is difficult to catch.

Remember, the goal of passing a ball is to make sure it is caught ... by your intended receiver.

You look at how complete an inventory of throws a quarterback possesses -- from screen passes to timed short passes to medium range passes and down the field throws. This complete range. For the scout, not having a complete inventory does not eliminate the quarterback. But you are looking to evaluate in all facets and distances and types of passes in throwing the ball.

There have been quarterbacks of greatness, Hall of Fame quarterbacks, who didn't have a complete inventory of passes. But you're looking to see the potential of the quarterback in each area. You can see where the emphasis of the offense would be if he were with your team.

A quick delivery , one that is not telegraphed to help the defense, gives the quarterback an advantage when he finds his intended target. That's when it is essential to get the ball "up and gone'' with no wasted motion. Some of this can be acquired by learning proper technique. But to a certain degree, a quick release is related to a quarterback's reaction time between spotting his receiver and getting the ball "up and gone.''

Touch is important, especially in a medium range passing game. One of Joe Montana's most remarkable skills was putting the right touch on a pass so that it was easily catchable by a receiver, who often did not have to break stride.

The ability to read defenses is not something that players have learned to a high degree coming out of college. Even if they have, the pro defenses are very different. But most systems require quarterbacks to look at primary and secondary receivers, usually based on the defense that confronts him. You can see if he locates that secondary receiver -- or maybe even an emergency outlet receiver -- with ease or with a sense of urgency.

This should work like a natural progression, not a situation where it's -- "Oh, my gosh, now I must look over here ... no, over there.'' You can see which quarterbacks handle these situations with grace. These are the types who have a chance to perform with consistency in the NFL.

Mobility and an ability to avoid a pass rush are crucial. Some quarterbacks use this mobility within the pocket just enough so they are able to move and pass when they "feel" a rush. But overall quickness and agility can make a remarkable difference. As an example, there were some very quick boxers in Sugar Ray Leonard's era, but he was quicker than they were and because of that he became a great champ.

Quarterbacks must be able to function while injured. The pro season is about twice as long and more punishing than a college season. They are vulnerable to getting hit hard every time they pass. They must be able to avoid being rattled, get up and show they are in control and can continue to lead the offense.

The single trait that separates great quarterbacks from good quarterbacks is the ability to make the great, spontaneous decision, especially at a crucial time. The clock is running down and your team is five points behind. The play that was called has broken down and 22 players are moving in almost unpredictable directions all over the field.

This is where the great quarterback uses his experience, vision, mobility and what we will call spontaneous genius. He makes something good happen. This, of course, is what we saw in Joe Montana when he pulled out those dramatic victories for Notre Dame.

Bill Walsh passed away 7 years ago, but I believe that his views on the quarterback position still holds truth in the present-day NFL.
The excerpt about downplaying the importance of pure arm strength certainly seems to hold true, as guys like JaMarcus Russell had a cannon for an arm, and yet did not pan out in the NFL. Jeff Garcia never the arm strength nor the 6-6 height of Russell, yet still managed to find success in the NFL, leading 3 different teams (49ers, Eagles, Buccaneers) to the playoffs.
Also, Joe Montana explained what Walsh's system was like from the quarterback's perspective in an interview with BleacherReport:

We had progressions and things. Walsh would say, "Look, I’m going to make a bad call." That’s what I don’t see as much from today’s style of offense. Yeah, they are up there making some calls, but usually they are changing a run to a run. If he made a bad call it was his mistake, but in most cases he was going to give you the best chance that you had and all we had to do was execute the play.

He would also say, "Look if this guy is open down the field, I’m going to give you a shot down the field. If it’s first down and the defender doesn’t like it I’m going to give you a couple more up here underneath." So I made sure I went through my progressions and got the ball out of my hands to one of those guys and we moved onto the next play. His thing was execution and he wanted it done perfectly.

Taking into account of the quotes made by Walsh and Montana, respectively, I can see why Lovie Smith would hire a guy like Jeff Tedford. Quick delivery, and making decisions within the structure provided appear to be characteristics that the Bucs coaching staff will prioritizing when scouting quarterbacks in this year's draft. It also may be why Mike Glennon's days as a Buccaneer are numbered, since Glennon clearly has flaws in regards to reacting under pocket pressure and finding the open receiver + getting the ball out quickly, as explained in detail by GurSamuel, and Gur explains it further in here.

Side note: I am curious if anyone here in the Bucsnation community has changed their minds about Teddy Bridgewater since Mel Kiper's initial January 2014 mock draft.

Content provided by a member of Bucs Nation and does not necessarily reflect the view or opinions of Bucs Nation.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bucs Nation

You must be a member of Bucs Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bucs Nation. You should read them.

Join Bucs Nation

You must be a member of Bucs Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bucs Nation. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker