The Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Franchise Tag: Connor Barth?
Starting tomorrow and going through March 5th, NFL teams will be allowed to place franchise tags on impending free agents to keep them employed with the team for one more season. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have a number of free agents, but few worthy of being re-signed, and even fewer worth of a franchise tag. In fact, only one such free agent comes to mind for me: placekicker Connor Barth.
The Bucs do have two other important free agents in Legarrette Blount and Michael Bennett, but neither player is scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent. In fact, Blount will be an exclusive rights free agent, which essentially means he cannot possibly leave the team and can be retained at a very small cost. Similarly, Bennett is a restricted free agent and his services can be retained with a relatively cheap tender of around $2,5 million. While another team could pilfer Bennett at the cost of a first-round pick, that's unlikely to happen. In addition, the Bucs aren't about to pay $10.6 million to retain Bennett's services by placing the franchise tag on him.
Connor Barth, on the other hand, is scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent, and given his stellar performance as a field goal kicker the past three seasons the Bucs will undoubtedly want to retain him. They can do so by tagging him at the cost of around $2.5 million, according to Pro Football Talk. It's a cost-effective way of retaining Connor Barth for at least one more year, and it would serve as a placeholder while the two parties possibly work out a long-term deal. And, well, it's not like the Bucs have anyone else they can realistically use the franchise tag on.
36 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
F the franchise tag.
We need to lock him up long term, he has been one of our only consistent players over the past couple of years.
Oderint dum metuant
Agree with this ^
Barth is worthy of a three to five year deal.
Good luck Rah. Bring us Mo Claiborne and replace Geno, Quincy, and Sean Jones!
You'd think he'd be loyal to the team who gave him a shot.
I do agree that he deserves a long term deal, he’s been the only stable kicker we’ve had for a while.
"Put a jersey on!!!" Warren Sapp
Agreed... besides giving a Franchise Tag to a K
sounds SO Dom – doesn’t it?
by Cracker Ball on Feb 19, 2012 8:12 PM EST up reply actions
Stable
Hes a good kicker but he doesn’t have that booming leg. I’d like to see him return anyways. Does Martin Gramatica have any kids nearing the age to become an NFL kicker?
Really don't need him to be a booming kicker.
The punter is the kick off guy becauseof his leg. Allows Barth to just be a place kicker and a darn good one at that. I say we just sign the guy. Show that if you do your job well we will actually keep you around.
Would be a more legitimate Contract earned than the one Quincy Black got last year.
sure he does
Might not have it on kick offs but the guy has hit several 50 plus yarders throughout his short career.
by NutterBuccer_99 on Feb 20, 2012 9:48 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
haha Gramatica is and always will be one of my all time favorites
Good luck Rah. Bring us Mo Claiborne and replace Geno, Quincy, and Sean Jones!
Just get him the new contract. Talk about team needs!!!
And hey, we can save his leg by scoring touchdowns you know. Go long term on a new contract for him. Come on Dom. This should be easy. Not a tough decision.
Give Bennett the Tag Sign Barth!
I want Bennett signed to a longer term deal. But i also wanna see one more year out of him like last year or will he be replaced with Bowers?
If u tag bennett u have to super overpay him
by Carlitin1988 on Feb 19, 2012 10:02 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
a better use for bennet
either we keep bennet for the 2.5mil tender or we get a 1st round draft pick that we can use to pick up mike wallace
Please pay Barth.
Him and Koenen were our best players last year.
by flash_kiley on Feb 19, 2012 9:47 PM EST via Android app reply actions
Give him his money
Barth is a real good kicker he deserves his money I mean if your going to franchise him give him that money he would make on the tag in a multi-year deal
I Maybe Wrong But I Doubt It
Names To Look Our For ...
LB : Rolando Mcclain
LB: Aaron Curry
FB/TE : Chris Cooley
by RIP SEAN TAYLOR 21 on Feb 19, 2012 10:48 PM EST reply actions
Chris Cooley Would Be Great For Us On So Many Levels .....
1. His Versatility , He can play fb & te .
2. Match Up’s Kw2 , Stocker & Cooley on the field on play action plays .
3. Block & Catch Well
by RIP SEAN TAYLOR 21 on Feb 19, 2012 10:51 PM EST up reply actions
This has nothing to do with the franchise tag or the kicker.
Maybe you should create a fan post since you have a lot of FA ideas.
Oderint dum metuant
And then of course,
There is the fact that he’s been rife with injuries the past few years. He’s finished 2 of the last 3 seasons on injured reserve, and even though he made it through every game of 2010 the knee injury he had surgery for is what allowed him to only play in 5 games last year.
No thank you, there are plenty of other TE options available in FA.
McClain and Curry I wouldn’t mind seeing come to Tampa, but it would depend on the price.
This is easy
Tag him, at the very least it gives us one more year. Plus it buys us time to sign him to a new contract so we don’t have to compete with the market
by Linus_van_Pelt on Feb 19, 2012 11:29 PM EST reply actions
Whoa! I'm sensing a pattern here:
Last year, the only player they could bother to grab during off-season free agency was a kicker. This year, the only player that worth the bother to protect during free agency…is a kicker.
The Glazers are up to their eyeballs in debt after acquring MAN U, a team of…kickers.
The Bucs and ManU have separate money piles.
The one does not relate to the other, one way or another. (Whoa, that rhymes…)
Am I going MAD, or did the word "think" escape your lips?
i agree with the consensus here.
Do the right thing and sign the man.
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Feb 20, 2012 2:39 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Wasn't Barth Our Leading Scorer
In 2011? Even if he wasn’t we still need to pay him.
by GoBuxGo on Feb 20, 2012 7:06 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Barth showed last year that he is a top ten kicker.
It only makes sense to sign him. Especially with the cap we have. Lock him up, we have enough holes on this team.
by flash_kiley on Feb 20, 2012 9:21 AM EST via Android app reply actions
This is a real no brainer, Dominik.
there is no need to franchise anyone this year.
barth needs to be signed long term.
period.
Franchise the new punter.
Put the tag on the new punter, because he’s on the field more than anyone else.

by 


















