Mike Mularkey on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers' Coaching Candidate List
And another name emerges: Atlanta Falcons offensive coordinator Mike Mularkey is also on the Buccaneers' increasingly expansive list of potential head coaching candidates according to Rick Stroud. The common thread for all of these head coaches so far is experience: each candidate has been a head coach before - except for Jerry Gray, who does have extensive experience as a defensive coordinator.
Mike Mularkey
Mike Mularkey should be pretty familiar for Bucs fans: he's been the Atlanta Falcons' offensive coordinator for the past four seasons, and has managed to beat the Bucs' defense into the ground repeatedly. He also started his coaching career as a Buccaneer, operating as a quality control coach and tight end coach in 1994 and 1995 respectively. That came after his nine-year playing career as a tight end for the Minnesota Vikings and Pittsbugh Steelers.
His coaching career progressed quickly: he went from tight ends coach to offensive coordinator to head coach within ten years, serving as the Bills' head coach from 2004 to 2005. He was the last coach to lead the Bills to a winning record, but resigned after a 5-11 season in 2005. Since then he's coached with the Dolphins before becoming the offensive coordinator for the Atlanta Falcons, his current job.
The Buccaneers aren't the only ones interested in Mike Mularkey. The Jacksonville Jaguars want to bring him in for an interview too.
Previous experience
Quality Control Coach, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 1994
Tight Ends Coach, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 1994
Tight Ends Coach, Pittsburgh Steelers, 1996-2000
Offensive Coordinator, Pittsburgh Steelers, 2001-2003
Head Coach, Buffalo Bills, 2004-2005
Offensive Coordinator, Miami Dolphins, 2006
Tight Ends Coach, Miami Dolphins, 2007
Offensive Coordinator, Atlanta Falcons, 2008-Present
Why Mike Mularky should be the Tampa Bay Buccaneers' head coach
- Is an offensive-minded coach with success developing young quarterbacks
More specifically, he's had success developing Atlanta QB Matt Ryan, who has turned into a good if unspectacular quarterback in his short career. As the offensive coordinator of the Falcons he was very involved with Ryan's development, and has constructed an offense around him that plays to Ryan's strength. Using the running game as the basis of the Falcons offense, he's managed to build a solid NFL offense after having to start essentially from scratch in 2008.
Matt Ryan also isn't the first quarterback he helped develop. He helped turn Kordell "Slash" Stewart into a capable NFL quarterback and got some productive seasons out of Tommy Maddox, who had been out of the NFL for five seasons at that point.
The Bucs could use a coach who can construct an offense and develop a young quarterback, as Josh Freeman has struggled the past season. Mularkey could be just the man for the job. - Has had previous success as a head coach
While he has an overall losing record as a coach and has never made the playoffs, Mike Mularkey has certainly had some success as a head coach: he's the only head coach to post a winning season with the Buffalo Bills since 1999. That's pretty impressive.
Of course, he did win that season based on an elite defense led by Jerry Gray, who is also going to be interviewed by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the very next season was an 11-loss season, so how much weight should that carry? - Has experience on a variety of NFL staffs
Mike Mularkey has been on a lot of different (successful) staffs in his career, and has worked with a number of coordinators. That's important because it means he has an extensive network to draw from when assembling a coaching staff.
Why Mike Mularkey should not be the Tampa Bay Buccaneers' head coach
- He hasn't been all that successful in building an offense so far
Yes, Mularkey has managed to build a solid offense in Atlanta - but it's nothing more than solid. They tried to become more explosive by drafting Julio Jones this season, but as soon as they tried to move to a pass-first offense it all fell apart. Mularkey's offense cannot function without a lot of running the ball, and that offense is not built to play catchup or compete with high-powered offense. It's not a bad offense - but it's a limited offense that can't really compete with the other offenses in the NFC South without a good defense. - He doesn't have that much experience as a head coach
He has had two years experience as a head coach, which isn't all that much. He had one good year and one bad year, and the difference between those two years was mostly the quality of the defense - which wasn't run by Mularkey.
Besides that, he resigned as head coach, which is an odd thing to do in a league where head coaching jobs are hard to come by. - Atlanta Falcons fans really hate his guts
I mean, really hate him. Being hated by your fanbase isn't uncommon among offensive coordinators, even good ones: they tend to be the subject of all sorts of hatred for messing up playcalling. Buffalo Bills fans don't seem to look back on his tenure with fondness, either.
That's not necessarily a commentary on his quality as a head coach, which should be a leading factor, but for a team that is struggling to sell tickets hiring someone who is hated by his own fanbase may not be the best thing.
Besides, anything that can make Falcons fans a little unhappy (like forcing them to keep their hated OC) is okay in my book.
Other Head Coaching Profiles:
74 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Whether I agree with each choice or not for whom they interview,
I am appreciative of the organization looking at several people, discussing scheme and philosophy and finding the right fit. I would much rather this search take weeks than days to find the right candidate.
As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.
Mike Martz would be a great offensive mind
but he might also get the QB killed. The bears will regret canning him.
Glad he's being interviewed but I think there are much better choices even among coordinators
I agree with Buc Wild, I appreciate a wide coaching search with a lot of candidates.
Not usually smiling in a mug shot.
Unless you’re Mel Gibson.
I want them to look at all options but I don't want another team to grab someone that we're considering
Many of the candidates discussed so-far are pretty boring and bland. I’d really like a proven winner or a fresh face because guys like Sherman aren’t going to get anyone excited about the future of the program.
Nothing wrong with talking to people...
But on our list of “should haves”, Mularkey is not at the top. Here is my own
personal wish list, updated 1/04/2012, in my order of preference:
1. Jeff Fisher
2. Bill Cowher
3. Rob Chudzinski
4. Mike Sherman
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. Mike Mularkey
12. Jerry Gray
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
Agree with all of that list. Good job.
by flash_kiley on Jan 4, 2012 10:48 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
Loved him as a player...
as the Los Angeles Rams were my home team back then, but running a DEF and managing an entire team are two different things. Now if he wants to join Jeff Fisher here as DC – I am completely on board with that.
Just a little more seasoning please…
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
Possibly...
and out of 6 potential HC candidates – you notice Chud is 3rd. We should talk to him, as he IS a hot commodity, but continue our interviews.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
I never claimed Gray was tops on the list
but he is on the same tier as Chud. Fisher remains my top choice of the names floated. Sherman the last (right behind Mularkey).
Sherman is not a sexy pick...
but his previous HC experience and his coaching network created during his tenure there is a big plus. We need quality assistants in the worst way and not sure the newbie candidates can deliver that.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
How is Gray a newbie candidate?
Sherman has 8 years in the NFL as either a coordinator or HC. Gray has 5. Sherman has more experience for sure, but Gray is hardly a newbie to the NFL. And I’m not even counting his playing days. Sherman wins here, but not by as much as you think.
And if you just count any NFL coaching
They’re pretty much tied in years experience, although Sherman does have the HC experience that Gray does not.
I hope we come up with a better guy than Sherman...
but we COULD do worse. The Glazers DID hire Raheem,so who knows what the hell they will do. I don’t care for the “re-tread” moniker as it seems negative. Having some NFL HC experience under your belt, even if it was not overwhelmingly successful, does prepare you for what lies ahead.
Plus, the network of assistants is a positive.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
Well, every single one of these guys is a huge imrpovement
We’ve got the bar set as low as it will go on that front.
I like that they are thorough,
but we do need to work kinda quickly. The last time we took our time, we ended up with Raheem and what we have watched the last three years…
by flash_kiley on Jan 4, 2012 10:47 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
I say... vote for BucNut1
Hey… Can I be your Head of Housing and Urban Development?
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
F*ckin' A yeah!
I just didn’t want to be greedy.
First order of business – Quincy Black get out.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
That's odd, my mom's is tomorrow...
She’s gonna promote her experience yelling at Auburn televised games. You?
Time to shamelessly plug my book and short story!
Metaphorically speaking
When you’re wandering aimlessly in the desert, parched for thirst,, anyone who hands you a glass of water looks pretty darn good. Fisher tops my list too but even candidates 5-10 of cracker ball’s list would be better than the predecessor. I voted yes primarily because of his offensive coaching experience. He deserves a look-see.
Just heard Adam Schefter say that Fisher
is deciding between the Rams & the Dolphins. Make of it what you will, but the he did not even mention the Bucs.
Perhaqps we are a dark horse...
AS IND and TB were Fishers preferred teams 2 days ago. Depends on your source I suppose.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 4, 2012 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
There's nothing on his Twitter about this statement.
Raheem was the DREAM that turned into a NIGHTMARE..
He said it live on ESPN radio
It wasn’t on twitter.
Well this didn't make his twitter
but he spoke about those two teams being the two choices Fisher is considering and broke down the appeal associated with each side.
Leverage?
Why would he show his hand this early in the negotiating process? This could be a good sign. Maybe he’s testing just how much the Bucs are willing to offer in both compensation and control.
I think we shouldn't have fired Gruden.
Allen, yes, but not Gruden.
Raheem was the DREAM that turned into a NIGHTMARE..
Chucky had to go
I think he became to predictable and he would of never drafted a rookie QB if we had Gruden still our starting QB would probably be McNabb right niw
by TampaBayAllTheWayFromCaliforni-A on Jan 4, 2012 4:06 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Raheem was the first firing by the Glazers I favored.
I wasnt in favor of Dungy being fired…nor Gruden.
Gruden didn't seem to have a long term plan based on the guys he was bringing in.
I know Allen had a lot to do with that too. I get the feeling that the owners had enough of Gruden and Allen’s act and wanted to move on.
Agreed. Bruce Allen only has a job in the nfl because of family connections. He had no idea how to build a team.
Gruden and Allen never drafted well. You can’t do that in this league.
As far as Dungy goes, he should have brought in a real OC, but that’s still no reason to fire him.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
he tried, but the owners still argued with him about it
Dungy was still upset about being forced to fire Shula, wasn’t too thrilled with Steckel, and tried to prove himself right going with Clyde. It was a sad state of affairs all around.
I’d like to think both sides have learned their lessons and are willing to let bygones be, so that Dungy can come back and SAVE US.
Time to shamelessly plug my book and short story!
It was time for Gruden to go
1) he had a 9-3 team that tanked December crashing hard to 9-7 out of the playoffs. Our defense still hasn’t recovered.
2) he had the sad habit of relying more on building through Free Agency than the draft. Few of his draft picks ever panned out for the team, and the Bucs kept getting bogged down with expensive FA signings for players who didn’t last more than 2 years. It’s one of the things I feel has made our current GM wary of working the FA market for key veteran leadership.
3) he was inconsistent: losing more seasons than winning them.
Time to shamelessly plug my book and short story!
The team tanking was all on Kiffen, the guy quit and the D quit with him.
We didn’t have any issues moving the ball or scoring, but our D looked like a Morris coached D and couldn’t stop anybody.
Raheem was the DREAM that turned into a NIGHTMARE..
It is like the SB yr overshadowed the mediocrity yrs after.
3 losing seasons. 2 seasons of 1 and done in the playoffs at home. The collapse in his last yr where he lost a veteran team where you can at least say Rah lost a team with young immature players.
Why did Mularkey go from OC to Tight Ends coach with Miami? 2006-07
Not sure anyone would demote themselves….
Mularkey or Sherman would be terrible hires.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
Vomits did you remember his stint with the Rams?
All his offensive stars like Marc Bulger, Steven Jackson, and Torry Holt publicly clashed with him on top of it.
What do you guys think of Mike Pettine, the DC of NYJ?
I know his experience is limited but both the Ravens and Jets D has done well under him.
Defensive minded coaches are not a good idea.
They idea that defenses win championships went out the window 5 years ago. We would be trying to implement a system that is incapable of winning in the modern nfl.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
I don't see any way
that we can get our offense to keep up with the Saints, GB or anybody else for that matter. When we did win it was because we picked Bree’s, sacked Ryan making him fumble. Im all defense and we have to get the turnover ratio back on our side. I mentioned Pettine just because he will bring some physicality to the team. I’m not sure who they will sign but we can’t expect our offense to put up 40 points a game.
then be prepared to lose games, and often.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
defenses don't win championships.
Period.
We need an offensive minded HC.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 2:59 PM EST up reply actions
Really?
Bucs won their championship because of D, gonna tell me it was because of Brad Johnson? Defense wins the SB as much as any offense has.
All I’m saying is our offense cannot put up 40 points a game, we can’t compete in a shootout.
who's won with defense in modern times, aka the last 4 years?
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions
let me rephrase this.
Who has won since you can’t touch the QB?
Aka the last two years.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
Bucs won their Super Bowl because Gruden knew Oakland's playcalls
it was more stupidity on the part of the Raiders coaches and QB not changing their calls at the line. Remember watching the NFL Films clip of John Lynch shouting “Sluggo C! Sluggo C!” and the play leading to a Dexter Jackson INT?
Time to shamelessly plug my book and short story!
Less than 5 years ago was New York's Super Bowl run
Where Brady was sacked 5 times and harassed all game.
by NewLogic on Jan 4, 2012 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, but how many of those would have been roughing the passer since the new rules went into affect?
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
Who knows.
I don’t have a recording of that game.That wouldn’t have stopped the large amount of pressure Brady was facing though.
yes it would have.
www.ottotd.com for all your rayz needz
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
Follow me @putupyourdukes
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Jan 4, 2012 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
The rule changes doesn't stop you from attacking the QB.
It just changes how you go about doing it. It with the new rules, the number of sacks during the season are about the same as there was in previous years.
I'm going by his stint in Atlanta
I can see why the fans hate him there. I tend to watch more of our division rival games whenever they on t.v. than any other teams and I think he has hancuffed the amount of talent they had.
I also remember his last yr in Buffalo how he lost a veteran team there so it won’t look good coaching up kids here. You mention the sucess of qbs he worked with but forgot to mention the failure of J.P. Losman.

by 




















