What can the Tampa Bay Buccaneers expect from Adrian Clayborn and Da'Quan Bowers?
Last year, Bucs fans' hopes and dreams were focused on first-round pick Gerald McCoy. Unfortunately, McCoy got off to a slow start, not making an impact until late in the season. When he did make an impact, it was late in the season and his surge was halted by a torn biceps, which landed him on IR. But this should not have been unexpected: history told us that defensive tackles in their rookie year don't often make a big impact.
This year, Bucs fans are pinning their hopes on Adrian Clayborn and Da'Quan Bowers, the Bucs' top two draft picks. These two players are supposed to energize a lackluster pass rush and help the Bucs finally stop the run again. But what does history tell us about rookie defensive ends? Hit the jump to find out.
Because the Bucs drafted defensive ends in the first and second round, I decided to look at all defensive ends drafted in the first two rounds since 1982, the first year the NFL started tracking sacks. I also wanted to weed out all the players who didn't play much, so I added a qualifier of at least 8 starts, or half a season's worth. Both Clayborn and Bowers are expected to be the starters from the first day. Pro Football Reference is perfect for this sort of research, so all these stats come from that site.
Unfortunately it's very time-consuming to differentiate between 4-3 and 3-4 DEs in this contest, so I didn't even attempt to do that. That undoubtedly depresses the results a little, as a 3-4 DE will naturally accumulate fewer sacks than a 4-3 DE simply because of the scheme. 71 defensive ends qualified, and they accumulated a total of 331.5 sacks, or 4.7 sacks on average. If Clayborn and Bowers simply match that, they will have 9.5 sacks. Not a stunning amount, but considering the fact that all Bucs defensive ends had a combined 10.5 sacks last season, this would certainly represent an improvement, assuming other defensive ends chip in a little as well.
Of course, Bowers or Clayborn could go off for a huge amount of sacks as well, but don't count on it. Only 9 defensive ends on the list had 10 sacks or more: Burt Grossman, Kevin Williams (he played at left defensive end in his rookie year), Darren Howard, Julius Peppers, Simeon Rice, Leslie O'Neal, Reggie White, Dwight Freeney and Jevon Kearse. Those are some very big names, and it's unlikely either Buc will match that total.
Even if Clayborn and Bowers fail to produce in their rookie season, that doesn't mean they have failed. Mario Williams had 4.5 sacks in his rookie year, but is one of the best and most well-rounded defensive ends in the NFL. Phil Hansen started with 2 sacks, but had a long and productive career with Buffalo totaling 61.5 sacks. Joe Johnson had just one sack in his rookie year, but played 10 years and made two Pro Bowls. Lance Johnstone started out with one sack, but had four years with double-digit sacks in an 11-year career. Darrell Russell had 3.5 sacks in his rookie year, before blowing up with two Pro Bowl selections - after which his career ended due to positive drug tests. And more recently, Chris Long had just 4 sacks in his rookie year, but had a very, very good third season with 8.5 sacks and a lot more quarterback pressure.
All that to say that a good rookie year is probably the start of a very good career, but a poor rookie year doesn't mean a player is a bust. Although no doubt we'll hear that word thrown around if these guys don't rack up a lot of sacks quickly, as that seems to happen every year.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They will do fine I am not expecting 20 sack this years
I know it takes time to adjust to the NFL I just hope that they do good can McCoy picks up from where he lefy off and also Price gets it going as well as miller our D-line will be very very good here in the near future that much I know.
I'm not expecting a whole lot on the DE's shoulders
I’m expecting alot from our last 3(price was projected 1st) , I mean 4 1st round picks. If McCoy or Miller can eat a double, we can have 3 man on man… Those are good odds. If they can gel and start swaggin’, this UNIT can be good.
Nasty pirate zombie.. Arrgg!
Bust will be thrown around for both guys I'm sure.
But a defensive line’s value cannot be gauged by sacks alone. I think this is why so many people are in the “sacks are overrated” camp. Sacks aren’t overrated, but they’re also not the only factor in judging a defense, or a defensive line.
The combination of Clayborn, McCoy, Price, and Bowers will help the LB’s and DB’s with their play, and that’s not counting the sacks they accumulate themselves. They’ll pressure the QB, create bad throws, disrupt blocking schemes for the running and passing game and overall just create havoc for opposing offenses.
I love the drafting strategy MD and crew have employed the past two years.
Everyone always forgets Miller
I personally don’t think Price will take over the job from Miller. Price, in my opinion, is best used as a situational rusher. Also, Miller has had one of the best camps from the DLine group. I don’t think he gives up that spot.
Agreed.
He’s been making noise in camp and Price is still recovering and heavy. Price and Miller will rotate. Either way, it’s a beast of a line.
well...
i expect both of these guys to get more sacks than our leader from last year… i want them to have at least 5 sacks.
by Gage Tyler Bain on Aug 5, 2011 11:26 PM EDT reply actions
I agree
I think they will get at least 5 – 7 sacks each.
by sports_aficionado on Aug 6, 2011 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions
I feel that with
McCoy blowing up the middle they will each have 5 sacks….EASY! I mean that is less than .5 sacks a game…..
Suddenly we have talent on the Dline.
I don’t know if the Lions will be shaing in their knickers. But that just gives us the opportunity to prove something.
I think Bowers and Clayborn will both be studs, and I feel like that's not blind optimism speaking for me, either
I remember watching Clayborn single-handedly dominate the 2010 Orange Bowl, and thinking, “Man, this guy would do some serious damage in a Bucs uniform.” And then I spent much of the 2010 college season watching Bowers and thinking, “This DE is f’n unreal; too bad he’ll be long gone by the time we pick. Oh well, at least we’ll have a crack at Clayborn.” Fast forward to April, and I was absolutely floored when we landed both these dudes. Did not see that one coming.
And while I don’t expect these guys to rack up a huge number of sacks right off the bat, I don’t think it’ll be long before No.94 and 91 are causing NFC QBs to have night terrors. Can’t wait! I thought the sheer sight of Bowers effortlessly attacking the sled in practice was a menacing sight. God help anyone who has to line up in front of that.

by 





















