Patriots - Buccaneers - Five disappointing Bucs on defense
When a team gives up four touchdowns in less than two quarters, there's a lot of blame to go around. Somehow it was harder than last week to find disappointing defenders, in part because this felt more like a schematic breakdown than individuals messing up. Still, some players always stand out - so who were the most disappointing players on defense?
LB Quincy Black
Black seemed to be out of position more often than not, and was probably (though not certainly) the one responsible for the blown coverage on the first touchdown given up. Black was given a big contract this offseason, but failed to do make a play against the Patriots. Black played well last week, but was largely absent against New England.
DE Adrian Clayborn
Clayborn played hard, again, but did not look nearly as good as he did last week. He couldn't make an impact in the running game, getting walled off a couple of times. He was completely shut out as a pass rusher by fellow rookie Nate Solder. On passing downs he moved inside as a 3-technique, but did not make much of an impact there either. Overall, a disappointing second game after a promising first game.
S Sean Jones
Jones messed up the coverage on Chad Ochocinco's touchdown, leading to an easy touchdown for the Patriots. He bit on the run fake and couldn't recover in time. While Jones was flying around otherwise, he missed at least one tackle and failed to stop anyone in time. Jones has been a solid safety for the Bucs, but this was a subpar performance.
LB Geno Hayes
Hayes has a chance to be a very good linebacker, and showed a lot of flashes last season. Unfortunately, he has not actually shown up in the preseason so far. Hayes is a small linebacker who gets stuck behind blockers - that's no surprise, but his strong suit has been shooting through gaps and using his quickness to get to the play. He has failed to do that so far in the preseason.
LB Tyrone McKenzie
Watching these games, it's easy to see why the Bucs want Mason Foster to start: he is much faster and more explosive than McKenzie. While Foster is missing assignments and still learning the playbook, he flies around and hits people. McKenzie was supposed to be like that: a thumper who could really help the Bucs' run defense, but I have not seen anything out of him that would make me start him over Foster. McKenzie and Foster were supposed to be fighting for the starting job, but Foster has apparently already won it, and with good reason.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To Clayborn's defense...
he was double teamed quite a bit during the game. on one drive i counted 4 times that he was double teamed. Solder is a big man anyways and was looked at as one of the strongest OL men going into the draft. Teams already know this guy needs to be double teamed, hence why the patriots did it quite often.
by Gage Tyler Bain on Aug 20, 2011 1:08 PM EDT reply actions
He had plenty of one-on-one situations in which he didn't do much
I’m not really concerned, but he didn’t look all that good.
It’s true that the Pats kept a lot of blockers in, though, especially early on.
Bucs D just looked flat the other night in the 1st Q
I bet it was hard to narrow this story down to just 5 underperformers on the D.
Did Bowers do anything this game?
by BUCSwillDOMINATE on Aug 20, 2011 1:32 PM EDT reply actions
Michael Bennett looked better than him
"I might not be shit to you, but my momma thinks I made it
We gon' ball 'til we fall or this Conjure get us wasted
And I never drink that white, all my women think I'm racist"
What About Bowers?
I don’t even remember him in the game…
Read above
"I might not be shit to you, but my momma thinks I made it
We gon' ball 'til we fall or this Conjure get us wasted
And I never drink that white, all my women think I'm racist"
We did look pretty flat
Better now then when it counts… Even though preseason doesn’t matter in the books, it matters to the players to go out there and end the game with a loss. Nobody likes losing.
by BUCSwillDOMINATE on Aug 21, 2011 1:05 PM EDT reply actions

by 



















