Josh Freeman was frequently blitzed, but he learned to beat the blitz
According to ESPN, Josh Freeman was blitzed (5 or more rushers) 37.8% of the time, which was 8th in the league. While Mike Sando ties that to 'respect', I wouldn't say that's entirely accurate given the fact that Jake Delhomme, Matt Hasselbeck, Vince Young and Alex Smith are some of the least quarterbacks in the NFL. Instead, this isn't about respect, but about what works best against each player or team.
This number helps explain in part why Freeman was under pressure so often, even when his offensive line didn't seem to be that bad, at least in pass protection. But the high frequency of blitzes was also caused by Freeman: blitzing him worked. According to Football Outsiders game charting data, he gained 6.8 yards per play when he wasn't blitzed, while he gained 6.3 yards per play when blitzed. Note that I didn't include a couple of plays where the number of rushers could not be identified.
Those 0.5 yards add up to a decent amount, though it's not an earth-shattering difference. And in part this discrepancy is caused by the fact that Pittsburgh and Baltimore were the most frequent blitzers, and those teams are very very good at blitzing.
What intrigues me most about the numbers is the difference in division rivals' play from the first game to the second game. When the Bucs were in Atlanta, the Falcons blitzed Freeman on 11 of 27 plays, or 41% of the time. When later in the year the Bucs played them at home, the Falcons blitzed Freeman on 13 plays, but he dropped back a whopping 43 times then. That means the Falcons went from blitzing him 41% of the time, to blitzing him 30% of the time.
That's a small sample, of course, but we can see the same change with the Panthers, who went from blitzing 41% to 36%. The Saints went from 53% to 35%, even. Overall, the three teams went from blitzing Freeman 46 out of 99 times, or 46% of the time to blitzing 34 out of 99 times, or 34% of the time. It's still a small sample size and Legarrette Blount's emergence probably had something to do with it, but it's also a sign that these teams didn't think they would be all that successful blitzing Freeman later in the year.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It means our OC is good at spoting successful hot routes
[url="Check out this mean tune":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVaEHtHJqeM]
His size and good feet helped too, he was able to get away.
I'm not negative, I'm just telling you how it is.
Teams do that to keep a lid on Freeman
He’s shown flashes of what he’s capable of and I think throwin a blitz at him is sumthing like an insurance policy. Force an untimely throw or squeeze him out of the pocket…bad news for DBS if he clears the box and busts through the second level of any defense. I’m waiting on my #5 stiff-arm poster
by GoBuxGo on Jul 23, 2011 10:01 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
It didn't hurt that they often put Williams in during pass situations
and Williams was All-World at picking up blitzes last season.
Formerly UNFNole
I also find that odd that he relates it to respect.
Not like F.O. to make unmeasurable associations. I think after watching the first season of production from Freeman it was obvious that he struggled to make accurate throws on the move. He greatly improved that this previous season. I haven’t seen the full list, but Vick was also rushed quite a bit when he was a Falcon, and I would say teams over-respected his abilities.
Formerly UNFNole
This wasn't Football Outsiders saying it's about respect
It was Mike Sando, the NFC West ESPN blogger.
But I don’t agree with the idea that it’s about respect either. It’s more about attacking specific attributes of a team and a quarterback, and to an extent a function of pass protection quality.

by 





















