One reason the Tampa Bay Buccaneers will struggle to improve: close games
In 2010, Josh Freeman became a hero to Buccaneers fans early in the season. As the sophomore quarterback led late-game after late-game drive, the Bucs kept winning games. It seemed like as long as the game was close at the end, the Buccaneers would win. But then the Bucs lost a close game to the Atlanta Falcons when Legarrette Blount failed to convert a fourth down. Later in the season, Freeman threw an interception against those same Falcons at the end of the game, losing them that game. Finally, the Bucs failed to put away the Lions late in the game, and lost in overtime.
Those losses taught the Bucs one thing: they can't rely on their quarterback to win them close games in the fourth quarter all the time. This is one reason the Buccaneers could struggle to improve in 2011. In 2010, the Bucs were 5-1 in games decided by three points or less, the NFL's best mark. This sounds great, but it's actually bad news. While it's often said that bad teams don't know how to win close games, the ability to win close games is not consistent from one season to the next.
This makes intuitive sense: in a close game, one lucky bounce can turn the tide. One ball caught instead of dropped can win a game, while one blown block can turn a win into a loss. One referee's call can swing a close game around.
The fact that the Bucs won a lot of their close games last season shows that the Bucs weren't just good at the end of games, they were also lucky. If the Bucs play the same way next season, they're going to have a few more balls roll the wrong way, and before you know it they're 0-4 in close games, and end the season 6-10 instead of 10-6.
To prevent that from happening the Tampa Bay Buccaneers need to learn not to play to their opponent's level, as they so often did last season. They need to drop the incredibly counterproductive first halves. Most of all, they need to learn to play well for 60 minutes instead of 15.
The 2010 Tampa Bay Buccaneers were good enough to crush the 2010 St. Louis Rams, but they played down to their opponent's level and barely won a one-point game. The Bucs should've destroyed the Redskins, but another one-point win, this time on a muffed extra point. Somehow Derek Anderson, Max Hall and the Cardinals defense managed to put up 35 points on the Bucs, more than any other team except the Steelers.
The Bucs need to learn that while their quarterback has shown up late in games, they can't always rely on him to save the day. Instead, they have to learn to score points early, to play defense for four quarters and win games in a convincing fashion.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cardinals offense
you wrote Derek Anderson, Max Hall, and the rest of the Cardinals defense managed to put up 35 points on the Bucs
by Brian Ahmed on Jul 14, 2011 10:22 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
He wrote it as a joke
The defense scored on us. It wasn’t just the offence. I think thats what he is getting at. Of course, he could have just messed up.
I think that with a improved d-line and a year of experience in those tough loses will make them better.
I have a very strong feeling that the D will be able to hold leads much better this year. If we can score early and force the other team to throw, with our secondary and young d-line…..close games won’t be as common.
With our secondary if we can score earlier in games and g
by skunk5150 on Jul 15, 2011 4:58 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I don’t know, mate, our defense right now is up in the air. Our secondary has two premier players who have absentee issues. Our leading tackler is probably going to bounce via FA. The linebacking corp will probably have a complete overhaul. Our NT is suffering a completely unknown injury and there is NO guarantee he will be the same player or if he even comes back.
Trust me friend, I wouldn’t imagine any outcome for our d yet. There’s just too much in the air right now.
((b-town))
The majority of the time
When you have to make a comeback, either your Offence or more likely defence has crumbled and you need a lot of luck to win that game. I think our D was the reason all those games were close. Freeman helped us stay close, but our D wasn’t good enough to maintain a lead.
"Ha, I'd swear Monty you're the devil himself..." " WHAT, WHO TOLD YOU I mean oh yes... yes..."- The Simpsons
I don't know who bacon is. - Indyshockwave
Come backs
This is not a game plan i said it all last year, the Bucs were /are young they need to learn to dominate go for the kill shot not a panzee feild goal.
Good points
But the Bucs were a much better team towards the end of the season. I know the Detroit game was ugly, but they are a young team, those kind of games will happen. The next week the Bucs blewout the seahawks and then went on to beat the defending champs in the Superdome pretty convincingly. If the Bucs start the 2011 season the way they were playing at the end of last season there wont be as many close games. Plus, with what should be a much improved d-line, and another offseason for their young players, they will be a better team.
by Bryce Blackwell on Jul 19, 2011 1:15 PM EDT reply actions

by 





















