Why The Tampa Bay Buccaneers Will Not Use The Franchise Tag on Barrett Ruud
Going on 1040 AM to talk Bucs, Stephen Holder claimed that the Bucs could use the franchise tag on Barrett Ruud. Superficially, this makes sense: the Bucs don't seem to want to make Barrett Ruud a long-term Buccaneer but both of their replacement options - Tyrone McKenzie and Mason Foster - are young players with very little experience. In addition, they are lacking coaching this offseason to prepare them for such a role.The ideal solution would be to have Barrett Ruud for one year while these two players learn the ropes.
Unfortunately, Stephen Holder's proposed solution is very unrealistic. Mostly because the deadline to use the franchise tag passed some four months ago. Even if the Bucs wanted to franchise Ruud, they can only do so if the new CBA provides teams with a new window to use those tags this offseason, and there is no reason to assume that will happen. Plenty of teams used the tag at the time: The Pittsburgh Steelers franchise Lamarr Woodley, the New England Patriots franchised Logan Mankins, the Baltimore Ravens franchised Haloti Ngata, the San Diego Chargers franchised Vincent Jackson - the list goes on and on. If the Bucs wanted to franchise Ruud, they should've done so in February when the window for doing so was open. Now it's too late.
Which brings me to my next point: clearly, the Buccaneers do not want to use the franchise tag on the Middle Linebacker. In February the draft had not taken place, and the Bucs had only Tyrone McKenzie as a possible replacement on the roster. Everyone in the NFL knew that a lockout was likely coming, and that if a lockout was going to happen offseason practices would be lost. The situation the Bucs are in now is exactly the situation they should have expected back in February. They knew that they were going to have to either sign Barrett Ruud to an extension, use the franchise tag on him, or throw a poorly-prepared player into the fire. Yet they chose not to use the franchise tag on him. The situation hasn't changed in any real way, so why would the Bucs now decide to franchise Ruud, even if they could?
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hope the hell they don't...
because he is no worth the top 5 pay at his position – or any position. Too many holes in his game to even remotely consider that. Not really a very good player against the run.
I’d rather give that kind of $$ to ILB Stephen Tulloch AND CB Johnathan Joseph instead.
We'll be playing against Mr. Ruud in week 1.
The Lions will say “Tampa never gave you a line to play behind, now that they have one they boot you? Come try your luck behind the Suh/Fairly wrecking ball. Oh and we’ll give you a 5 year contract.”
Our only way to stop DET...
is to do it from the inside. Ruud will run around some and try a glancing blow on LeGarrett Blount when he runs by, which plays right into our hands.
Yes… please sign him.
by Cracker Ball on Jun 23, 2011 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Fairly raw...
I think Fairly is still a bit raw to call that duo a wrecking ball just yet.
True, but he won't tell them that.
He’ll say “throw in a mustang and I’m all yours.” Honestly I wish him all the best. I just don’t think they’re bringing him back.
Bwahahahaha I'm all yours
Ruud is a scrub that has no upside. McKenzie and Foster have potential, let them slug it out and whoevers left standing at the end of camp wins the job. Those boys would push each other hard, it would only benefit us Buc fans.

by 




















