Salary Cap Space: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Will Have Around $55 Million In 2012
The Bucs have been near the top of the league in terms of salary cap space this season. Back in September, ESPN reported that the Bucs had $27.2 million in cap space, a number that likely hasn't significantly changed. That ranked them second in the league. The Bucs had all of this cap space, but didn't use it on the deepest free agency class in NFL history. They didn't use it to extend their own players, either, although there haven't exactly been many candidates for extension this season.
Keeping all of that in mind, the Bucs will have even more cap space next season. Per Andrew Brandt of the National Football Post, they will work with a salary cap close to $150 million, as the $25 million of 2011 cap space rolls over to next season. With a reported salary cap number of $92.873 million in 2012 (per ESPN), the Bucs will have nearly $55 million in salary cap space.
The question now becomes: will the Bucs spend this money, and who will they spend it on?
The first question is hard to answer: they haven't spent a lot of money in the past couple of seasons, and the salary floor won't force them to spend money either*. On the other hand, the Bucs clearly need talent at a few positions (most notably cornerback, safety and linebacker), and Mark Dominik's plan does include spending money on free agents at some point. Most notably, it includes spending money on positions where drafted players have failed and signing players who will start.
The Bucs have seen their draft picks fail at several positions this season, though the question is to what extent that's going to be a long term problem. Brian Price and Gerald McCoy haven't produced the way the team wants them to produce, but both players' lack of production can be chalked up to injury - so is that a long-term concern? Quincy Black was a solid linebacker before he was re-signed to a new contract, but his play has collapsed this season. Is that a long-term problem? Aqib Talib has been a pretty good player, but his off-field problems bring his long-term prospects with the Buccaneers into question. Tanard Jackson has shown a complete inability to tackle this season - but can he do turn himself into his 2007 version again?
The Bucs will have to find ways to answer these questions this offseason to determine where and if they're going to spend money in free agency. There's also always the possibility that Mark Dominik is replaced after this season, though that seems a little unlikely. If that happens, the Bucs could overhaul their free agency strategy too.
Ultimately, I think the Bucs will spend more in free agency this offseason than they have in years past. Then again, I thought the same thing last season - so who knows.
*:A salary floor accounted for in cash spent was instated in the last CBA, but that won't come into effect until 2013, and even then its effect will be limited. The Bucs will have to spend 90% of the salary cap in cash per year, but they'll have to do that over the four-year period 2013-2016, and then the four-year period 2017-2020. That means they can be below the salary floor for several years, as long as they compensate for that later on. Even if they don't do that, they'll simply be penalized the amount of money they didn't spend - so they won't be forced to spend that money on players, either.
50 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just imagine how many soccer players Man U can get now...
because history has shown it won’t be spent here. Hopefully the new regime can hold the checkbook for a while, and we can send Dom on an extended vacation just before the F/A signing period begins.
Problemsolving at its finest…
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
That Man U myth continues to float around
Yet every Man U fan will tell you that the Glazers haven’t spent on that club.
Well they can't take it with them...
so where is it going? Rat b*stards…
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
Oh that's it, just give 'em a way around the spending...
I can’t believe you actually typed that out. Ugh!
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
I am going to have a huge, well small bonfire with my hundred dollars or so.
Maybe I will go to islands of adventure instead. Lol
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 29, 2011 2:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Very nice, was it chunky so it stuck? Lol
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 29, 2011 2:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I think these questions are premature until we see what happens with firings
I expect Morris to be gone and Dom to stay, but who knows? If they go for the complete clean sweep I have no idea what happens.
But I do agree with everyone else, they had better spend money on free agents. There really isn’t another option at this point if they want to win. Big if.
Yugly.
I have a feeling they will spend a little bit
in Free Agency just to give the casual fan the impression that they care.
That is how I see it too.
Perception isnt always reality.
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 29, 2011 2:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
They will probably resign a bunch of our own free agents....
to show that we are signing people. We need new players. The majority of our free agents haven’t been signed yet for a reason…we need new competition.
by flash_kiley on Dec 29, 2011 1:41 PM EST via Android app reply actions
$16 mill ST Gunner to be signed in the offseason
"I'm a little dysfunctional
You're the problem, Please don't awakin me
And I'm that way cause back in the day
Most have forsaken me"
by 4QB on Dec 29, 2011 2:01 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
8 million on a long snapper, I'm betting on it.
by flash_kiley on Dec 29, 2011 2:10 PM EST via Android app up reply actions 2 recs
It's a good thing we have this cap space
Now we can properly give Rudy Carpenter the big contract he’s not worth.
We can't waste anymore time getting Lumpkin locked up long term.
If he gets to free agency he will make bank….
by flash_kiley on Dec 29, 2011 2:40 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
Hell, lumpkin will probably get a 4 year, 60 million contract...
As will mack and everyones favorite whipping boy dare I say his name!!!!
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 29, 2011 2:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Sai, check your trades.
i support casual racism
by Boddington on Sep 19, 2011 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I literally wish I had killed myself on the train station after I got laid off
by Sean O on Sep 28, 2011 7:49 PM PDT
I want a BUC'N criminal investigation.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Sep 28, 2011 7:48 PM PDT
by internet commenter on Dec 29, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
the bucs are so lucky they have such a great stadium and such a great stadium deal.
or else this team would be out of here in a couple of years. specially if the glazers dont open up the checkbook
If the bucs dont spend money on f/a i dont know if i will watch next season, i mean honestly if we dont get at least 2, yes at LEAST 2 big names in f/a then im not putting myself through this embarrasment and pain next year. i wanna punch a wall thinking about this year
yep, Jerry is using his own money to build a stadium.
the Glazers have the tax payers build a stadium….then sell some of the more expensive tickets in the NFL…then dont spend money on a coach or talent…those guys are making bank on the Bucs.
Cowboys Stadium was built using $325M of tax payers' money
And almost every NFL stadium was built with public financing.
you skillfully left out that the
total construction costs of the Cowboys Stadium was 1.15 Billion. Yes, the tax payers coughed up approximately a quarter of the total cost. Most of the money for that stadium was paid from Jerry’s pocket.
Sure
I’m not disputing that. Just noting that your claim wasn’t entirely truthful. I’m pretty sure Jerry Jones is making a ton of money off that deal in the long run, though.
Also, the Glazers spent a ton of money on the Bucs in early years – and essentially every year until around 2005. Don’t forget about the brand new training facility they paid for. They’ve always spent a lot of money on coaching hires, too, even recently when they gave Jon Gruden his $5M/year extension they’re still paying for (one more week, that is). I’m sure the Glazer have made some serious cash, but they’ve also historically spent quite a bit – just not in recent years.
I agree...so
what event coincided with the abrupt stoppage in spending? I think it would be nice to see just how much money they are making by not spending. Have they come to the realization that making money is more important than winning? These are questions most Bucs fans have. I do know that Malcolm was a spender…but now that he is no longer running things…the funding has stopped. Why?
simply because they dont care about winning!
im going to start believing this. I think you hit it right on the head when you said they just care about money not winning and i think they are at the point where they know they are going to make money anyway so who cares.
I’d prefer any owner of any team i like to only own that team, i know most of you guys dont think manchester united isnt an issue but if you own the yankees and the la galaxy who would you care about more ?
by Carlitin1988 on Dec 29, 2011 5:39 PM EST up reply actions
i disagree.
if they didnt care about winning then they would at least they would spend money on high profile stars (Jerry Jones, Dan Snyder) to get fans in the seats instead of just winning.
ALL ABOARD THE TRENT RICAHRDSON TRAIN!!!
TV contracts, collective bargaining agreements.
…I really would like to see a peice written on this subject. Maybe there is one out there already.
This, basically
You don’t need to sell out a stadium to make a profit in the NFL. Hugh Culverhouse made that abundantly clear decades ago, and the other Bucs (the Pittsburgh Pirates) are doing the same thing in the MLB.
that is true however there has to be a support of the team
its not really about selling out the stadium. but nobodys going to buy merchandise or support anything that generates revenue for the team.
ALL ABOARD THE TRENT RICAHRDSON TRAIN!!!
Up until around 2006 you can all blame it on salary cap situation
The fact that they built a new facility for $30+ million probably didn’t help. Since 2009 I can buy the argument that they wanted to build through the draft and didn’t have a lot of players to spend the money on in-house.
On the other hand, I can also see the other side of the argument. People who have talked to the Glazers in person have always said that they seem to care deeply about the Bucs. Without looking in their books and their hearts, it’s tough to say for sure.
Business expenses = tax write off
The Glazers can afford the best tax consultants in the business, so all of their big $$ expenditures can, and most likely have, been absorbed in the sneakiest of ways.
They can still laugh all the way to the bank…
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
thats alot of money
I say a great hc a good dc and oc dj Williams and Vjackson…..I think we need a good oc one who will use benn the right way I feel sorry for the guy
by blountforce72 on Dec 29, 2011 4:04 PM EST via mobile reply actions
anyone but norv turner
guy has had a team loaded with talent for a while now and cant seem to do anything with it
by Carlitin1988 on Dec 29, 2011 5:22 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe we can get him as a coordinator.
kinda like Wade Phillips. Great coordinator, below average head coach.
by flash_kiley on Dec 29, 2011 6:16 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
Weis just signed as the new HC of Kansas...
so he is not really available anymore.
by Cracker Ball on Dec 30, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't want Weis as HC anyway, much better OC IMO.
Raheem was the DREAM that turned into a NIGHTMARE..
If they pick up Fat Albert's $7 mill option- it will be like $48 totally
"I'm a little dysfunctional
You're the problem, Please don't awakin me
And I'm that way cause back in the day
Most have forsaken me"
I hope they restructure his contract...
and keep him here a while longer. The last time he played in a 4-3 (his 1st year in WAS) he played very well and I believe their DEF was ranked in the 8-9 range at seasons end. McCoy seems to get hurt – a lot. Need a big beefer in the middle there.
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions

by 





















