Buccaneers - Panthers Top 5 Defensive Plays
Top 5 defensive plays. No. Nooooo. No. You can't make me. You can't make me go through that game again. You can't force me to try to find some semblance of defensive play at any point in that game. I mean, the Bucs had two tackles for loss in the entire game. Two! That's ridiculous!
...
Okay, fine, I'll try to find some. There. I've found one: Michael Bennett sacks Cam Newton. I mean, that's kind of awesome. Michael Bennett at nose tackle because no one remotely capable of rushing the passer from that position is healthy, and he beats a double team with a spin move to sack the QB. Great play. Only good defensive play of the game.
No? Not enough. Come on! You're really going to put me through this? Well, fine then, have the four worst defensive plays of the game to round out this list. Hit the jump for the suck!
Tanard Jackson forgets he's a deep safety
2-9-CAR 9 (13:20) (Shotgun) C.Newton pass deep right to B.LaFell for 91 yards, TOUCHDOWN
This play is hilarious. If you can get past the point of the Bucs being terrible, that is, but I'm guessing most of us got past some five weeks ago. It's really a play that should never have happened. It starts with the Bucs zone blitzing, dropping Clayborn into coverage. The idea there is to get some unexpected pass rushers going the other way and overloading the offensive line, but nothing of that sort happens. There's some pressure on Newton eventually, but that's mostly just Mason Foster being a pretty good blitzer and pushing back the running back blocking him.
So yeah, next sequence of events in that play: Cam Newton throws a high ball down the field to a covered receiver. I say he's covered, because E.J. Biggers is running with him step for step. Apparently, that's not covered as LaFell makes a terrific leaping grab on a very high ball.
Here's what would have happened had LaFell been a Buccaneer: he would have tipped the ball and a deep safety who knew what his responsibilties were would be intercepting it.
But, these are the Panthers and they're playing the Bucs. So LaFell catches it, E.J. Biggers can't get up high enough to disrupt the pass, and his expected deep safety help has completely disappeared. Where to? Well, Tanard Jackson decided that jumping a route by Greg Olsen in the middle of the field was a terrific idea when he's supposed to be covering the deep middle of the field. Face, meet palm. Tanard Jackson was actually benched for messing up here.
Tanard Jackson forgets how to tackle
2-4-TB 49 (:33) (Shotgun) C.Newton up the middle for 49 yards, TOUCHDOWN
Tanard Jackson has been a horrible tackler this year. I can't overstate this. I actually think he's worse than Sabby Piscitelli every was. And Piscitelli may be the worst football player I've ever seen on a field. Everything has gone wrong for Tanard this year in the tackling department: he doesn't wrap up, he doesn't know how to run through an opponent, he doesn't know how to hit, and he lacks any and all physicality. That's all pretty weird for a player who used to be a hard hitter and sound tackler.
All of that was perfectly on display on this play. The Bucs get clowned by a read-option play, letting Cam Newton get into the secondary untouched. Michael Bennett bites on the dive RB, Quincy Black overruns his gap and he's off. That's not all that interesting. What's interesting is what happens some 15 yards downfield. Newton makes one pathetically easy fake, cuts - and Tanard Jackson is left gasping for air. No shot. To finish it off, he drags E.J. Biggers into the endzone. Touchdown, Panthers.
Sammie Stroughter tries to make a play for his team - and messes up
At this point the game was well out of hand, so this didn't have a huge impact on the game. But it was still pretty stupid. Sammie Stroughter decided to take a kickoff out of the endzone, gets blasted at the eight-yard line and loses the ball. That's a sequence of bad decisions and plays: first he decides to take it out, when he really shouldn't. Then he can't manage to even evade the first tackler. Finally, he doesn't hold on to the ball.
"But Sander, that's not a defensive play!"
Yeah, well, NFL.com's video section calls this a play by the Buccaneers defense. They always mess that up on kickoff return fumbles. But I'm using their labeling as an excuse to get that play in here. Hah.
Random Panther runs for 20+ yards
The Bucs gave up a whopping seven 20+ yard runs to four different players during the game. I'm not going to watch them, because they're all the same: the Bucs defensive line can't hold the point, the linebackers don't stay in their gaps, and no one can make a tackle.
There, I just saved you the need to watch any running play against the Buccaneers the past five weeks. Kind of me, right?
38 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
lol
If we’re counting special teams as defense, I choose Ahmad Black’s first NFL tackle of Stroughter as the defensive play of the week.
Yugly.
Sander really?
This is a joke of a post. I respect what you say an most of your post are point on but this is an even bigger joke then the Bucs.
by Benjamin Patterson on Dec 28, 2011 12:19 PM EST reply actions
Haha calm down a little bit.
Don’t be mad at Sander, be mad at the Bucs for playing pop warner football…
by flash_kiley on Dec 28, 2011 1:47 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
I am mad at the bucs..
I just expect better writing from Sander he is the best writer on here an every other post he has done has been on point an pretty much what I was thinking an this is just a mockery of his work he is better then this. I am sorry if I offended him an the others that will see this I truly am, it is just that there is enough writers bashing us an as I said he is better then this. I am sorry
by Benjamin Patterson on Dec 28, 2011 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
There were no Top 5 Defensive Plays in the past game
There really weren’t. So I went this route instead.
Nice job Sander, in spinning our ineptitude into something fun...
if you can’t laugh at yourself…
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 2:37 AM EST up reply actions
Your right
about Sanders posts and he is right on point with this one. I too am sick of the bashing of our bucs but you get what you deserve and frankley I think Sander could have been more harsh than he was. Thanks for the laugh Sander
That's big of you to apologize
I appreciate that.
by flash_kiley on Dec 28, 2011 5:56 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
I will take bennetts sack
since I don’t reward incompetence!!!
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 28, 2011 12:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions
What happend to Tanard?
HIs first game of the season was like he didnt miss a beat, and he has got worse every week since.
Agreed.
He regressed big time over the course of the season.
by The Bull Gator on Dec 28, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
Mason Foster got juked so bad he fell over on one play.
What are our thoughts on him at this point? I feel like we need to upgrade the linebackers 1st and I haven’t decided how I feel about him. Hayes might still be a real starter if he’s well supported by the other linebackers and the safeties, but Quincy needs to take a walk and Mason doesn’t look like a long time starter. Maybe he’s salvagable though.
I have to give Mason a little more time.
At times he looks like the ability to play is there, but he hasn’t developed consistency. With some that takes a season or two. Others never get it. I won’t write him off yet, because he has had his moments. 2012 will be very telling for him.
by The Bull Gator on Dec 28, 2011 1:16 PM EST up reply actions
Those moments
are why Im hoping he will be alot better next year. MLB is basically a QB, and he has had to learn a ton with no training camp. I think he will be alot better next year because he will be reacting and not thinking
Foster started the season off pretty well
The second half of the season hasn’t been as good, but he’s been battling some nagging injuries too. I think it is wait and see on him. Too early to call.
Yugly.
Mason is a beast
We have zero coaching an this guy has done nothing but play solid most of the year. We need backer help like none other but Mason is not the one that needs to be replaced. We need both outside backers replaced Black sucks an Hayes is way to inconsistent to be a starter in this league he has been around awhile an I do not believe he will develop into much more then he is now. Mason is a rookie people and a rookie on the youngest team in the league that has not one coach that we can count on to get our team prepared. from the head coach to the db coach we need to get new coach all across the board.
by Benjamin Patterson on Dec 28, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
foster is not a starter at MLB.
I like Hayes. He can be solid if surrounded with a good LB corp. We need a veteran MLB.
ALL ABOARD THE TRENT RICAHRDSON TRAIN!!!
foster is serviceable though...
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 28, 2011 4:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Look at when foster started this year
He was running around smashing dudes and playing football. Now he is always behind a blocker or he under shoots his lines. Has regressed horribly. He needs to be moved or at least not making the calls yet. Another fail on morris. A kid with no nfl experience making the play calls for the d. Set him and us up for failure.
by lorigfan44 on Dec 28, 2011 6:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Agreed.
He has regressed. The defense has been bad for a couple of years, but the way it had looked this year is embarrassing for everyone attached to this team. I thought Foster would be an impact performer based on the first couple of games, but now people are saying getting rid of Ruud for him was a mistake; the same #51 that almost everyone was bashing last year. Hopefully he will improve next year.
Oderint dum metuant
I agree, would love to see him in bucs uniform.
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Dec 28, 2011 11:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If Burfict fell to the 2nd round, I would like to get him.
We need someone who plays with anger. Hopefully, as he ages, he will mature.
Oderint dum metuant
I thought Ruud should stay all along
Look, I like Foster a lot, but putting him in there with nobody to mentor him as a rookie was just boneheaded. He had a good shot at getting Ruud’s job anyway, but it gives him time to ease in and learn.
Yugly.
Well, Ruuds contract is up in TEN...
and I imagine we would not mind coming back here – for the right price. He has very little leverage right now, as he had a poor year in TEN. I am personally on the fence about that signing however. We did have a very bad year defensively, but I don’t think it was because we didn’t re-sign Ruud. I believe it was because we did not try very hard to adequately replace him before he left.
Thanks again, Dom. More douchebaggery…
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 8:25 AM EST up reply actions
Rah wanted to keep him cause he knew he would be lost without him
Rahdumb the clown and the not ready for prime time players are the worst team in Buc history, the 1976 squad gets a pass cause they were an expansion team, there is no excuse for this garbage!
by bucfanlostiniowa on Dec 29, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
It is pointless to bring him back now
New coaches, new defense, etc. His value was his knowledge of the defense we were running and his leadership. That isn’t coming back after letting him walk and getting new coaches.
We should have kept him this year, but I don’t see much reason to bring him back. And just ot be clear, our defensive problems went way beyond just not bring Ruud back. I am under no illusion that bringing him back would have magically solved all our other extensive defensive problems.
Yugly.
Solid reasoning...
because nobody here bagged on Ruud more than I did – but he IS a salvagable player. Of course, I would like to see a much better player found for MLB and kick Mason Foster outside, but if Dom continues his trash-digging only lord knows what he will find for us.
Ugh…
by Cracker Ball on Dec 29, 2011 9:04 AM EST up reply actions

by 





















