Game Film: Missed opportunities, route running and pass blocking
An NFL offense in some ways is similar to a machine: there are many parts that need to work together for successful plays to happen. On run plays, the quarterback needs to execute the handoff, the running back needs to run hard and find the hole, while his blockers need to,well, block. If one of those things doesn't happen, a negative play is the result. The same goes on passing plays: pass-blockers need to block, the quarterback needs to throw an accurate ball, the receivers need to execute their routes. If one of those things, doesn't happen
And on interesting play past Sunday, one of those things didn't happen. Specifically, Kregg Lumpkin failed to execute a key block turning a possible touchdown pass into a sack and robbing the Bucs of their best chance to win the game. Not that it was a big chance, but at least it was something.
This play illustrates a problem with Kregg Lumpkin: he's not a great pass blocker, and he's not a great pass receiver either - he does not do a good job finding the hole for extra yardage consistently. That's a little baffling for a player who is on the roster solely to be a third-down back, and who has been in the league for four years now - enough time to learn the skills necessary to thrive as a third-down back.
That doesn't mean Lumpkin always blows his blocks in pass protection. He has had some great blocks too - but too often he whiffs or fails to stay in to protect Freeman, and that's a real problem.
Hit the jump to see exactly what happened, and how the Bucs could have had a chance to win the game, even with just a minute left.
Now that we've seen the play, we can talk about it in depth. First, note the game situation. It's 2nd&10 with just 1:19 left in the game as the Bucs are down 9 points. They need a touchdown, an onside kick and a field goal to win the game. That's nearly impossible - but anything can happen in the NFL.
The pre-snap formation is easy enough. The Bucs line up with three wide receiver, one tight end and one running back. Kregg Lumpkin is the RB in the backfield looking to pass block or leak out as a dumpoff option, while Mike Williams and Arrelious Benn are the outside receiver. Benn's presence would have been a surprise just five weeks ago, but he has been getting a lot of work in three-receiver sets the past couple of games. Sammie Stroughter is in the slot, which is a little surprising as Preston Parker is clearly the first option as a slot receiver.
The key thing to see pre-snap, though, is Green Bay's movement up front. They have two defensive linemen with their hands on the ground and everyone else mulling around and changing position to confuse the Tampa Bay protection. Freeman does a good job resetting and adjusting his protection, though, and the Bucs pick up every rusher with no real mismatches.
While the Packers present seven potential rushers, the Packers rush five trying to overload the right side of the offensive line. The Bucs have little problems picking up the rush from a responsibilities point of view, but two players blow their blocks: center Jeff Faine and running back Kregg Lumpkin. Faine just gets pushed back, but that at least doesn't really affect Freeman. Lumpkin blowing his block, though, that's the killer: it allows Woodson to get to Freeman and bring him down.
But Freeman himself deserves some criticism too. He does a good job sliding away from pressure and keeping his eyes downfield, but if he had broken the pocket and scrambled to the left he could have avoided Charles Woodson. The Green Bay cornerback was on the ground grasping at Freeman's legs, and if Freeman had moved just one yard he could have gotten the ball off. In fact, he could maybe have gotten rid of the ball a little earlier, although that's a lot easier said than done.
What's interesting about this play is that Freeman singled it out in his post-game press conference. "On the play where I got sacked Mike [Williams] ran a great route and really, I thought we had a touchdown. But right as I'm getting ready to throw it a guy grabs my leg and that was a shame."
And watching that play again, that's really clear. Mike Williams is on the left side of the field, and if you watch the play again you can see him leaving his defender in the dust. In fact, that's a beautiful route by Williams who runs a very smooth and fast route, while still fooling the defender. Watch him widen his route to the outside, then turn his hips to the inside - which is what draws in the cornerback - and then run straight by the corner.
Although I can't see the safeties I can make an educated guess as to the type of coverage the Packers are playing: man coverage with a single high safety. There are five pass rushers leaving six playes in coverage. I can see three during the play, all appear to be playing man coverage, and one appears to be spying on Freeman. That suggests man coverage on the four eligible receivers, one spy and one safety - who should be playing center field.
That's supported by the reaction of the cornerback after being beat by Mike Williams: he immediately panics and starts running after Williams at full speed, which he wouldn't do if this was a variant of zone coverage. It's unlikely that a safety could have come over in time to break up the pass, and if Williams could have made him miss or even gotten behind him this would have been a touchdown. The Bucs would need to recover an onside kick, but if they did they would have about a minute to drive thirty yards and kick a field goal to win the game. Unlikely, but possible.
Conclusion
This play showed off a couple of interesting things about the Bucs, which is why I singled it out. It shows that Arrelious Benn is earning more playing time as a wide receiver. It shows that Kregg Lumpkin is lacking as a pass-blocker, which is a real problem for a third-down back. It also shows that Josh Freeman could do with a little more scrambling. And finally, it shows that Mike Williams still has his skills.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No, lumpkin doesnt always blow his blocks!!
He just BLOWS!!!!!
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Nov 24, 2011 7:44 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Dang It!
You took the best line. Does anyone know just WHY we couldn’t or wouldn’t keep Caddy under contract. Was it like Ruud in that he wanted a longer term deal than we were willing to offer? Looking in foresight during the off season or in hindsight now, it just seems dumb that we didn’t keep Caddy.
Still don't understand why we didn't keep Caddy...
why put an entire season on the shoulders of such an unproven RB core?
Exactly
It was stupid not bringing him back. It’s 1 of many examples of the Domanik not having a plan B. He is thinking Graham can fill in the spot not remembering he’s 31 and injury prone. Caddy is really missed this yr for sure.
He did have a plan B
The hope was that Kregg Lumpkin could develop into that third down back. That didn’t work, but that’s how the front-office operates: they prefer to give young guys the chance over signing ‘proven’ veterans.
I wonder how much longer that stupid policy stays intact...
as we could be making playoff travel plans instead of becoming a “whipping boy” again.
by Cracker Ball on Nov 25, 2011 3:37 PM EST up reply actions
Sproles would be looking good in pewter.
by BUCSwillDOMINATE on Nov 24, 2011 11:32 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Ok after review of this play it shows me two things.
First Lumpkin did blow the block badly. Second and most importantly, Josh Freeman didnt read the defense correctly. Freeman did not look to the side where Woodson came from in the first place. If he would have he would have seen the blitz coming and saw that Stroughter in the slot was wide open as well. But Freeman just stared down the first option as usual. Now Williams was open, and Lumpkin should have picked up his block so its still majority on Lumpkin. And Stoughter should be the starting slot over Parker. He is a better player than “upside” Parker
Get it to Winslow. He's open!!!!
Stroughter has shown nothing this year
While Parker has been easily the most productive and most consistent receiver on the team.
Consistent??? I'll give you that.
Productive. Sorry. Dont get me wrong he is doing good at his role for now, but Stroughter is better in the slot, and the return game.
Get it to Winslow. He's open!!!!
What do you even base that on?
Stroughter hasn’t done anything as a receiver since 2009. Parker has been a very good player this year. I don’t get what your problem with Parker is.
Most productive means he would have the most yards, catches, or tds.
Which he doesnt.
Get it to Winslow. He's open!!!!
Ehhhhh thats kinda apples vs oranges.
Regardless Stroughter was wide open if Freeman would have checked to that side and seen the blitz. But Blumpkin should have made the block.
Get it to Winslow. He's open!!!!
Most pruductive receiver don't mean the best receiver.
Parker has been the most consistant receiver on the team this yr. What Buc games have you been watching that made you suggest Straughter should be starting over Parker?
Next man up
Stroughter last year was clutch for us in several games. Then, he got injured and Parker stepped up. Parker has been clutch this year. With Williams not in last year’s form and Winslow and Freeman not being in sync, Parker has been the go-to guy. Just based on what I recall of Stroughter and seeing Preston this year, they seem pretty equal in skill set. Parker was given an opportunity this year and he’s done well with it.
Understandable
What i’m saying is that Parker isn’t playing Stroughter off the team. Which has been implied. We need both on the team and will use both and they are interchangeable. But to insist that Parker is so good that we dont need Stroughter is insane. Just my opinion that Stroughter is a tad bit better.
Get it to Winslow. He's open!!!!
There is a rumor going around...
Word is that Sander was the kicker who missed the field goal in the Buccaneers Bud Light commercial. Lol Can you confirm or deny?
Get it to Winslow. He's open!!!!
He is being modest!!!
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Nov 25, 2011 12:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions

by 





















