Albert Haynesworth's first game with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Meh
Albert Haynesworth was brough onto the team to stop the run, and get to the passer. With the Bucs giving up over 180 yards on the ground and over 230 yards through the air while notching just one sack, I think we can come to the conclusion that they failed miserably. But that doesn't mean Haynesworth had a bad game. In fact, he's getting some good publicity for his play.
Some of that is absolutely justified. I just got done charting his presence in the game, and I saw him on the field for 42 snaps, and he impacted the play on 11 of those snaps. I took a pretty liberal definition of 'impacting the play' in charting the game, but he certainly didn't look bad. He obviously has a ton of talent, and that showed as he at times beat his opponent at will. I have few complaints about his play early in the down, when he generally held his ground and made a few impact plays.
Unfortunately, he also displayed inconsistent effort, especially early in the game. That image of him laying on the ground making no effort to get up in a Redskins game? Yeah, you could make another gif of a similar occurrence in this game. Haynesworth doesn't play to the whistle: when the play goes away from him, he generally stops playing. That's a bad habit on a young team and defensive line that can pride itself on at least hustling downfield and trying to make plays throughout the game.
But that's something the Bucs knew when they signed Haynesworth. You have to take the lack of hustle with his impact plays, and it's something the Bucs are willing to live with - for now, at least. He'll certainly be downgraded for those loafs in his film review session, though. Just as I'm sure that blocked extra point will be taken away from him: that play was made by Michael Bennett and Brian Price, and I'm not sure who of those two ultimately blocked it, but it wasn't Haynesworth.
Overall, I thought Haynesworth had a decent game. He got a couple of tackles and impacted the game, although he didn't really get any pass pressure. He also wasn't really given a chance to get some pass pressure however, as the Texans threw the ball on only a handful of plays. Haynesworth gives the Bucs some decent play at defensive tackle right now, but it's nothing special. His impact won't win the Bucs any games, but it won't hurt either.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I noticed that play you are talking about.
It apoeared that he just gave up. Basically his game today was okay. A warm body!!
East Coast Fan
by Bucfan on Nov 13, 2011 10:21 PM EST via mobile reply actions
He was perfectly serviceable
and that was about all I expected him to be. He’s a back-up: the media wanted to make more of the signing than was there.
Fire. Greg. Olson. NOW.
He played much better than was expected.
I’m not saying he’s a stud, but I certainly consider Haynesworth better than Miller. I’m still pretty much in a mix of shock/anger at how our season went to crap over the past month.
Rahiminik building a dynasty! Stephon Gilmore, Dre Kirkpatrick, Cliff Harris, JayRon Hoseley, Alfonzo Dennard, Morris Claiborne, Vontaze Burfict, or Mark Barron.. Are one of you guys the final piece to the puzzle here? Lots of QB's and OL this year, someone has to fall! ATL & NO don't have picks bwahahahaha
Agree that he's an upgrade over Miller
Interested to see if Haynesworth gets the start over Okam once he’s healed.
Fire. Greg. Olson. NOW.
by RookTakesYou on Nov 13, 2011 11:14 PM EST up reply actions
Give him until the end of the season...
before you make your judgements. The guy was a Buc for 3 days before starting the HOU game and did not play poorly. No more so than anybody else out there…
I hope we have Bowers, Haynesworth, Price and Clayborn together for the rest of the year. I want to see what could be. We have no one better and no real reason to not give a look. We are certainly not having a post-season in 2011, and the DL is the strength of our DEF.
by Cracker Ball on Nov 15, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions
My childhood memories of Saturday morning cartoons (remember when that was a thing?)
insist upon Fat Albert. Hey hey hey, gonna have a good time.
Fire. Greg. Olson. NOW.
by RookTakesYou on Nov 14, 2011 1:40 AM EST up reply actions
He is nit worthy of "Fat Albert"
That is for Pujols, and other name to fame achievers out there.
I prefer “haynesworthless”.
by BUCSwillDOMINATE on Nov 14, 2011 8:11 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
A/h is an upgrade over miller
So ill take it as a succesful start. I mean it got ugly and the guy did not give up
by Carlitin1988 on Nov 13, 2011 11:42 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I noticed Clayborn specifically going 100 miles per hour on every play, regardless of where the ball was.
He seems to be making progress
As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.
Better than I expected
Well while not a major impact he did make more tavles than he did all his time at NE…..of couse that wasn’t much.
For just arriving I would say he did well. If he gets into shape and learns the scheme (ah, we do have one don’t we?? I couldn’t tell) he will be of some help.
Too bad he can’t play line backer, or cover deep. Wow, that was an aweful.
I don't know about the rest of you but that picture of Ward celebrating makes me sick!
RAHEEM IS A JOKE! OLSON IS GARBAGE! THE GLAZERS SUCK!
by bucfanlostiniowa on Nov 14, 2011 4:30 PM EST reply actions

by 























