Freeman, Stafford, or Sanchez?

But I really shouldn’t. Stafford has Calvin Johnson to throw to, and Pettigrew and Burleson are no slouches. Plus, his running game got a good upgrade with Jahvid Best and they got some good upgrades on defense (though their defense is still terrible if you ask me).
Sanchez has 3 or 4 good quality receivers, a good running game and a killer defense.

And then Freeman – he has a TE who’s got some injury issues, only one somewhat competent receiver with experience and a defense that showed extremely little last year. Even if he’s going to be the better QB next year, he’s going to be in a worse situation than the other two.

No- I don’t hate Freeman. It’s just that it will take time for him to gel with our WR’s and gain their trust, also- the matter that he has lit. no one proven to throw to.

Seems extremely unlikely to me, really, because Reggie Brown isn’t that kind of player. From what I’ve been hearing he’s the fastest WR of the bunch and he’ll easily be best on the outside. Benn and Stroughter seem much more likely to man the slot.

And I don’t blame any of you, that’s how homerism works.

However, the three QBs had similar statlines through their rookie seasons, but both Sanchez and Stafford are in significantly better situations than Freeman. It’s not impossible that Freeman has the best year, who knows, it’s the NFL, but reasonable expectations would be that he has the worst year of the three.

I’m saying Stafford since I kind of expect Sanchez to cave under the pressure.

But Matthew Stafford has tons of weapons now so i think he’ll have a better year stats wise
and Sanchez has an All Star lined team to carry him so he’ll have the better year team wise
but its not like any of them are Peyton Manning so if Freeman puts up some soild resonable numbers i think he’ll be right at pace with both of them

it’s hard not to go with the playoff QB from last year.

Now if the question had been, who will show the most improvement compared to last year (the gist of the article) , Freeman would have a legit shot.

Stafford plays for the Lions. I just can’t get past that.

simply cause I think his team will have the most success out of the 3, I think Matthew if he stays healthy will have the best statistical season. I feel Freeman will shoe the most growth out of the 3 as well as show that he is a better leader between the 3.

If you measure success by team record, then Mark Sanchez has a clear leg up but is at a disadvantage because of the strength of his defense and his coaches propensity to run the ball. This will affect his statistics because he wont be throwing as much.

Consider Matt Stafford and you have a situation where he is poised to take a step forward with arguably the most talented reciever in football a slightly improved defense and an unreliable running game. He will be called upon to toss the “skin” around alot more than Sanchez considering his divisional opponents ability to score points and the secondary issues of both Chicago and Minnesota. This circumstances lay the framework for Stafford to have a much better year 2 than year 1.

Our guy Freeman has some of the same “issues” working in his statistical favor (though a subpar defense is hardly a good thing) but considering the Saints ability to put up points, the strides that Atlanta is attempting to make in applying pressure and scoring points. Freeman, like Stafford will be called upon to help keep us in many games this year and will see a significant boost statistical performance due to those circumstances. Add that to the fact that we have experienced what I believe is an upgrade (not hard to do) our receiving corps and all that time that has been advertised that he has been spending studying and training and we should see the biggest improvement from OUR Quarterback.

not the team record at the end of the season. The NYJ are head and shoulders above DET and TB, so Sanchez will appear more successful based on that alone. I think Stafford got the help he needed and will benefit more from it. Freeman still needs some help to make it happen here.