Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage Of New York's Victory Celebration

My 10 Buccaneers predictions for the upcoming 2010 Season

 

 1) Mike Clayton will be cut. The Buccaneers drafted two receivers in the first four rounds of the Draft for a reason. Benn and Williams will start with Stroughter at the slot. Brown and Stovall will be rotational receivers, but 4th and 5th on the depth chart respectively. Preston Parker and Mario Urrutia will be on the practice squad on make occasional appearances due to injury.

 

2) Josh Freeman will throw more touchdowns than interceptions this season. The entire offseason with his coaches and teammates will greatly benefit him. He also has a whole season under his belt. Just remember... Two of his three wins came against the Super Bowl Champion New Orleans Saints and the playoff-bound Green Bay Packers.

 

3) The Buccaneers will win the first game of the season. It's not that bold of a prediction. The Browns are still the Browns after all.

 

4) The McCoy-Price-Miller DT rotation will boost the Buccaneers back into the top 15 rush defenses.The Panthers and Steelers will be huge, early tests to gauge this. Don't count out that you may see all three on the line at the same time.

 

5) Donald Penn will gain at least 30 pounds during the season. Dude, put down the fork and get yourself the contract you deserve. I would offer "6 years/$40 Million/$15 MIllion guaranteed" with escalators for keeping his weight down. LOL... Just kidding.

 

6) Sabby Piscitelli will be cut. He has shown that he was a poor draft choice by the previous regime and needs to go. He misses tackles by taking horrible angles. Strong safeties should be able to step up to the line scrimmage on occasion and help in run support. He might be a special teamer somewhere.

 

7) The Buccaneers will win "8" games this year. This is a little bold for my own tastes, but I have faith. Carolina's defense will suffer greatly this year will the loss of Julius Peppers. Atlanta's secondary doesn't strike fear into anyone. Dunta Robinson can't do it all by himself. Pittsburgh is a possible win Big Ben being gone, but it's kind of a long shot with how good their defense always is. Plus, we got Detroit and St. Louis on the schedule.

 

8) Barrett Ruud will play out his mind this year. Think about it. Everything is in his favor. He has two new toys in the middle of the defensive line (McCoy and Price). He won't be learning a new defense, but be sticking with the familiar Tampa 2 style. He has solid players all around him. Plus, he will be playing for a new contract. Hopefully, the Buccaneers don't let it get all the way to free agency. "5 years/ $35 Million/$15 Million guaranteed" has a good ring to it. Do not give him "Patrick Willis" money.

 

 

9) My cut list... (Notables)

S Sabby Piscitelli

DT Dre Moore (practice squad)

WR Mike Clayton "the blocking icon"

LB Rod Wilson (practice squad)

LB Adam Hayward (practice squad)

DE Michael Bennett

DE Tim Crowder (practice squad)

WR Mark Bradley (practice squad)

WR Mario Urrutia (practice squad)

WR Preston Parker (practice squad)

TE John Gilmore

QB Rudy Carpenter (practice squad)

OL James Lee (practice squad)

WR Terrance Nunn (practice squad)

 

10) My 53-Man Depth Chart going into the year...

Offense

QB - J. Freeman / J. Johnson / J. Snead

RB - C. Williams / D. Ward / K. Huggins / C. Smith

FB - E. Graham / R. Taylor

WR - M. Williams / A. Benn / S. Stroughter / R. Brown / M. Stovall

TE - K. Winslow / J. Stevens / R. Purvis

LT - D. Penn / X. Fulton

LG - J. Zuttah / M. Dile / X. Fulton

C - J. Faine / J. Compas

RG - D. Joseph / M. Dile

RT - J. Trueblood / D. Dotson

 

Defense

LE - M. Evans / K. Moore

UT - G. McCoy / R. Miller / R. Sims

NT - B. Price / R. Miller /  R. Sims

RE - S. White / E. Lorig

WLB - G. Hayes / A. Crowell

MLB - B. Ruud / N. Koutouvides

SLB - Q. Black / J. Alston / D. Watson

LCB - A. Talib / E.J. Biggers / E. Mack

RCB - R. Barber / M. Lewis / E. Mack

FS - T. Jackson / C. Lynch

SS - S. Jones / C. Grimm

 

Special Teams

K - H. Lawrence

P - B. Bowden

LS - A. Economos

KR - C. Smith

PR - S. Stroughter

 

These are just my thoughts. Feedback?

Poll
Which prediciton is the most off-the-wall?
1
13 votes
2
4 votes
3
4 votes
4
4 votes
5
26 votes
6
30 votes
7
36 votes
8
10 votes
9
23 votes
10
8 votes

158 votes | Poll has closed

Content provided by a member of Bucs Nation and does not necessarily reflect the view or opinions of Bucs Nation.

Comment 84 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like everything you have said

But i’m not sure about how i feel About how Ben and Mike will be starting at WR for us this season. I mean it would be nice, But lets face it, WR is one of the hardest positions to transition from college to the Pros….the Speed of the DB’s and lets not forget just the monster playbook. I can totally see throwing to a WR who was supposed to curl and instead ran a post.

by shadowchicken on May 6, 2010 3:19 PM EDT reply actions  

My guess is that Freeman may not even have the entire playbook

absorbed yet, so running an abbreviated route tree to allow the most talented, but green, WRs on the field seems reasonable. Its not like our playbook looks like the Colts playbook.

by Cracker Ball on May 7, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Olson throws the ball

It was evident during the whole season last year . He is gearing up Freeman to push the ball down the field . Cracker you know that he is a Mike Martz disciple , say what you want but there were 300 yard passing games for QBs on this team last year against some good secondaries .

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mike Martz had Marshall Faulk, we do not. HUGE difference.

He made the offense go. Without him (aka a solid running game), the passing offense was nada.

As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.

by Buc Wild on May 7, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Martz was also with

the Lions and 49ers who did not have Faulk, and they threw the ball more cause of that matter . When Jag was here we were going to the pound game when he left that plan left.

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

How successful was Martz with other teams who did not possess a Warner or Faulk?

As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.

by Buc Wild on May 7, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Offense was not those teams problems

Lions and 49ers offense was productive while he was there but you can only get so far with just offense

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

How productive were their offenses? They weren't '99 Rams good (I think it was '99 at least)

Martz can run a good offense, but the parts have to be there.

As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.

by Buc Wild on May 7, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Take this into account

How long was Martz on those teams, more important how long did it take Martz offense to be effective without his personnel. Numbers don’t lie and the numbers say Martz offense is effective where ever he goes

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Martz style team does not fit with every team.

Our personnel does not set up for us to throw it 40+ times a game right now. Martz was at his best when he had a mix of pass/run. He used Faulk as a WR out of the backfield with a lot of swing passes that doubled as runs.

As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.

by Buc Wild on May 7, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Rams offered

players for Mike O to be great, you can’t deny that he was ineffective in other places he went

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes I can

And in fact, I already did so. I’ll quote myself

He didn’t get to the playoffs, but he definitely improved their offenses. A lot. The Lions went from 254 the year before Martz was there to 305 points 346 in the two years Martz was there. Once he left, the offense regressed to 268 points and the team went 0-16. The 49ers went from 219 to 339. Those are some really significant improvements.

And yes, turnovers went up in both cases – but not at the rate that the points scored went up. Not anywhere close.
The idea that Martz’ offenses were bad elsewhere stem from the fact that he was working with much worse personnel, but he brought marked improvements to each team.

by Sander on May 7, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

It takes 3 years

To fully implement a system with the personnel you want . Some get it done in less than 3 and kudos to them some don’t get it done in 3 years and are usually fired . The thing with Martz he can go to any team and the first year you would see a difference

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's not true

He didn’t get to the playoffs, but he definitely improved their offenses. A lot. The Lions went from 254 the year before Martz was there to 305 points 346 in the two years Martz was there. Once he left, the offense regressed to 268 points and the team went 0-16. The 49ers went from 219 to 339. Those are some really significant improvements.

And yes, turnovers went up in both cases – but not at the rate that the points scored went up. Not anywhere close.

by Sander on May 7, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

No it doesn't

But it does gives you a since of how our Offense is suppose to be run

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Olson used and kept Martz' playbook, which I doubt he did.

I’m sure he took some from it, but everybody has their own ideas they want to put in. And just looking at the formations last year, it was nothing near what Martz does, more like Mike Shula.

Stay thirsty my friends.

by bucnut1 on May 7, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if Olson kept Martzs' playbook

we clearly do not have the horses to run it.

by Cracker Ball on May 11, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

'Course not

It doesn’t reflect on Olson at all. I was just responding to what you said about Martz.

by Sander on May 7, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I kind of think

Olson is more of a Gruden guy than Martz. By the accounts I have heard Martz and Olson were not very close.

by McBuc on May 7, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is a segment on Buccaneers .com

called Behind The Flag they interviewed Olson and he went in depth on how our offense will be ran, and it sound like a Mike Martz offense

by keysersoze19 on May 7, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with everything.. except...

I think we will run with one moe reciever.. prolly Parker, although I am curious about Nunn

by lilbunnywabbitt on May 9, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure why we take NUnn

and cut Clayton.

"I'm not saying this is a blowout, but updated NBA schedule has ' * - if necessary' next to Games 3 and 4." John Hollinger

by MNeilson on May 10, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

You must not of herd

but Penn lost the weight to get a new contract already . I am with ShadowChicken I feel Brown and Stovall is key to the rookie wideouts transition like Leftwich and JJ was for Freeman . Crowell plays the SLB . Crowder played better than Moore lats year so if you cut 1 you might as well cut the other . And Sabby will get bench but he still can contribute, and might be better served coming off the bench

by keysersoze19 on May 6, 2010 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't see Sabby being cut

He may be bad, but the Bucs are invested in him and they’re probably going to give him another year to play behind Sean Jones. Top 15 rush defense seems overly optimistic. They also may keep John Gilmore as a run-blocking tight end, as both Stevens and Winslow are lacking in that aspect.

by Sander on May 6, 2010 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree with some of your points, and your article is well-written.

Disagree on Tim Crowder to practice squad, as well as Gilmore getting cut for the reason Sander stated.

Cannons... fire them.

Buc'Em - SBNation's home for discussion of all things regarding the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

by Craig T on May 6, 2010 3:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Almost forgot about Crowder

No way is he getting moved, he’s projecting as the starter at LDE if Moore isn’t up to it.

by Sander on May 6, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clayton will not be cut in 2010

They have a lot invested in Clayton, and will give him one more year. If for no other reason than to rasie his trade value…which at this time is not so much.

by McBuc on May 6, 2010 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

I doubt it

Every single report about what the Bucs think of Clayton has been negative this offseason. When mentioning the wideouts that are in competition for a starting position, they don’t even name Clayton. And Clayton has been on the trade block for a while.
They have a decent amount of depth at WR now and there’s really no reason to keep Clayton around.

by Sander on May 6, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does he still have garunteed money coming his way?

I am really not sure, but if not I will agree with you. If they have to pay him 4 Mil or something, they might as well keep him around and see if he can improve for the same reason we think everyone else will improve…same system, QB, etc. If they keep him, I hope he improves. I tend to agree with a post I read by BW a while back. There are way too many indicaters over the years that say he will not…not word for word.

by McBuc on May 6, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

If they cut him, they owe him nothing

Guaranteed money has already been paid, so there’s no reason to keep him on the roster for that.

by Sander on May 6, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

If they owe nothing

My opinion has been changed. Thanks Sander.

by McBuc on May 7, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Only thing I dont see happening is Sabby being cut

Yeah he did terrible but he could still be the top backup safety.

by Yankees10 on May 6, 2010 4:41 PM EDT reply actions  

One more

I dont think Maurice Evans will be a starter

by Yankees10 on May 6, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rah likes Maurice for some reason

Lorig over Crowder or Bennett I seriously doubt it . I herd nothing about Huggins I want to see what he is going to do with that 4.28 speed

by keysersoze19 on May 6, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sabby might not get cut

compared to the rest of the safety depth, keeping him as a backup / special teamer makes sense. I have a question aboot the nickel spot, is that something Sabby can play or are they saving that for another player?

Witty's 2010 Draft review is full of meaty goodness. What you mean, you're vegan?! Sigh. Just read it.

by witty on May 6, 2010 5:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Have a couple of issues, but most have already been stated.

It’s a little early for me to make 10 predictions.

Also, your only allowed to have 8 max on the practice squad. You have 10.

"I'm not saying this is a blowout, but updated NBA schedule has ' * - if necessary' next to Games 3 and 4." John Hollinger

by MNeilson on May 6, 2010 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

I also don't think Snead will beat out Carpenter.

"I'm not saying this is a blowout, but updated NBA schedule has ' * - if necessary' next to Games 3 and 4." John Hollinger

by MNeilson on May 6, 2010 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair Enough.

It was just a small point. Thanks for taking the time to put this together.

"I'm not saying this is a blowout, but updated NBA schedule has ' * - if necessary' next to Games 3 and 4." John Hollinger

by MNeilson on May 7, 2010 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree with #4 & #7
  1. - I still think we’re going to see growing pains at the DT position
  1. - I think that we’ll win more than 8. Maybe 9.

Other than that….great article. Good job.

by Bucs on May 6, 2010 10:16 PM EDT reply actions  

To win 9 games....

our DT combo will have to be excellent.

"I'm not saying this is a blowout, but updated NBA schedule has ' * - if necessary' next to Games 3 and 4." John Hollinger

by MNeilson on May 6, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

#10

I would bet money on this being our roster when it’s all said and done. Although I voted #5 not being a good bet. I don’t see Penn making the roster.

by Freeqsalot on May 7, 2010 8:52 PM EDT reply actions  

He is our best tackle.

He will make the roster, but may get traded during the year.

by Tiny iZ Boss on May 7, 2010 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

9th reason is wrong

I desagree with 9 the most mostly because your practice squad cant and wont happen the practice squad is only for rookies and first year players so guys like tim crowder,rod wilson,mark bradley, adam hayward, mario urrutia, and james lee wont be elgible for the practice squad. And why would u have Tim Crowder, and Adam Hayward on the practice squad anyways the are both proven players and crowder will compete with kyle moore for the starting nod. Also Hayward is a proven special teams player and will bring well needed depth. Also Barth will be are kicker this year mark my words! And lastly Evans and grimm wont make the cut this year grimm is too small and wont make it in the nfl count on it!

by tampabuc51 on May 7, 2010 9:04 PM EDT reply actions  

5th, 9th, 10th

Maurice Evans won’t be starter, Sergio Render will make the roster, Tim Crowder will make roster and is my choice to start at LDE, Barth will be kicker, Heyward has been the backup for the last 2 years so most likely he will maintain that role not be cut, Rod Wilson isn’t even on the team, Micheal Bennett will make the roster, Jon Alston won’t make the team, Lorig will either be practice squad or IR. Penn won’t gain any weight he has already slimmed down this year by like 20lbs.

by TheRookie51 on May 7, 2010 11:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Bucs special teams

IF you look at the numbers we have 1 of the best special teams in the league, Rah took this serious and a hole OTA practice was based on special teams which Rah gave it the nickname WE-fense

by keysersoze19 on May 11, 2010 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Like the nickname or not

it was part of the Bucs buying in to what Morris was trying to do and it was effective as our We-fense is 1 of the best in the league

by keysersoze19 on May 12, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

When a team goes through a rebuilding process it is not going to be pretty

with that being said Rah and Dom has done a good job at getting this team back on the right track. Compare our fist big Franchise to two other teams rebuilding, we have Josh Freeman as our franchise QB, the Broncos basically traded Cutler for Tebow and the Chiefs have Cassel tell me Buc nation who would you rather have

by keysersoze19 on May 12, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

You do know though that any coach probably would have gotten only 3 wins

The team is re-building and any coach would have struggled with this group of players

by Yankees10 on May 12, 2010 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

but not every team would of got their guys to compete with no chance to make the playoffs, you credit that to the coaches and the payers believing in what the coach tells them

by keysersoze19 on May 12, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

But I know that a team that is not packing it in for a lockout season would have actually done a HC search and not hire a guy with no experience for very cheap.

Don’t be surprised if Cowher is the next HC here for the next season we play after this year. There’s a reason he decided to wait a year, and I bet it’s to wait for here.

Stay thirsty my friends.

by bucnut1 on May 12, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do want us to win

but if we don’t (and me thinks we won’t), then… “Bring in the Chin”!

by Cracker Ball on May 12, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

O yea and that set us back again

why build our Tampa 2 D, and Build around Olson offense which requires more throwing than power running for next year, then bring in someone who is going t run a 3-4 and power run offense sorry but if we planned to bring in Cower then the personnel for a Cower team would have started this year in the draft. If Cower come in after next year we will be an 3-13 team again his first year, even Romeo got 3 years to prove himself

by keysersoze19 on May 13, 2010 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Alston won't make the team

He was brought in as a free agent probably almost exclusively to be a big time contributor on the WE-fense! We lost some key components to our We-fense this off-season, and I believe that this move was the first of a series of moves to make sure that the BUCS special teams remained one of the elite units in the NFL. Cody Grim and Dekota Watson and drafting a Punter were some of the tail end moves to shore up the WE-fense! Long story short… Alston-Grim-Watson-Lynch all make the team for special teams first and depth at their respective positions second!

by kvdig8 on May 11, 2010 11:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bucs Nation, SBNation's home of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Your one stop for Buccaneers info, opinions and more.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ken_small
To Draft a CB or to not Draft a CB
Small
Recent RU Alum - About Schiano

Recent FanPosts

Small
hello bucsnation
Tampa_bay_buccaneers_old-320x480h_small
Top free agents available 2012
Tampa_bay_buccaneers_old-320x480h_small
Rumor has it....
Small
Sign Barber to deal that includes coaching clause.
S-redskins-extra-point-video-large_small
Riddle me this?
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft
Tampa_bay_buccaneers_old-320x480h_small
Lets hire.......
Small
Return of the FB
Tampa_bay_buccaneers_old-320x480h_small
Any word or progress on our OC/DC?
Derrick-brooks-pic_small
Is there a quick fix to the Bucs defense?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Twitter


General Managers

Nfl_tampa_bay_buccaneers_1_small Buc Wild

Footballav_small Sander

Head Coaches

Wku_1__small LeeCaz

Assistant Coaches

Green_bay_packers_v_tampa_bay_buccaneers_qaxeamkamowl_small jarldg

Ryan_and_the_boys_small T-Jack

Australianraven_small RookTakesYou

Me_small KRoa

Small Tahay